What the convention fixes
Almost nothing, and that is the point worth making plainly.
A band’s rating is a force, usually printed in kilograms or pounds, that the band exerts at some extension. What extension is the crucial variable, and it is the one listings routinely omit. A band described as 15 kg might reach that at double its resting length, at triple it, or at a figure nobody wrote down.
The colour code that accompanies the rating fixes nothing at all across brands. It is a house ordering — lighter to heavier within one maker’s range — and it carries no meaning between ranges.
What it does not promise
It does not promise a constant load. The whole behaviour of an elastic is that resistance rises as it stretches; a rep performed with a band is loaded least where the movement starts.
It does not promise comparability between brands, between lengths, or between looped and tubed constructions.
It does not promise anything about durability. Latex ages, and it ages faster in sunlight, in heat and against rough concrete. A rating is a property of a new band.
And on this shelf specifically, it does not promise the figure was measured at all. Many listings inherit a range from the factory sheet without any published method behind it.
What it works with
It works with the resting length a maker publishes, because a rating without a length is a rating without its denominator.
It works with the width and thickness on looped bands, which are the dimensions that separate two bands sharing a colour.
And it works with what the band is anchored to, which on suspension trainers and door anchors is a separate published figure and is frequently the real limit.
How we read it on this site
Ratings are reported exactly as the maker publishes them — the range, the unit, and the colour name if the maker uses one — and the page says whether an extension is specified. Where it is not, the page says the figure is a point on an unstated curve, which is the true reading.
No page here converts a band rating into an equivalent weight, and none ranks bands by their printed numbers alone. Where a set is compared, it is compared on the lengths, the dimensions and the construction, because those are the figures that were actually measured.
Questions readers send in about this
Do the colours mean the same thing across brands?
No. Colour coding is a house convention and nothing more: one maker’s green can sit either side of another maker’s green. Pages here quote the kilogram or pound range a maker publishes and treat the colour as a name, because that is all it is.
Why do two bands rated 15 kg feel completely different?
Because the figure is one point on a curve and the curves differ. Band length, width, thickness, material and whether it is a looped or tubed design all change how quickly resistance builds. A short band reaches its rating sooner and climbs faster than a long one.
Is a band’s rating comparable to a dumbbell’s mass?
Only loosely, and not at any single moment. A mass applies the same force through a movement; a band applies least at the start and most at the end. Comparing them as though they were the same unit is the mistake this page exists to name.
Last reviewed 20 September 2026